All doctoral students are required to pass a qualifying examination and an oral defense of this exam prior to formal admission to candidacy for the Ph.D. degree.
Schedule a date for your exam with your Supervisor and the other two members of your Qualifying Exam Committee. All three must be members of the STEM Education Graduate Studies Committee. The Graduate Coordinator (Jeffrey Grimes), needs to be informed of the dates.
Please note the following:
a) you should book the oral defense about 2 months before - you will reserve a room for your oral exam through the C&I seminar & conference room request site
b) you should work with your Supervisor to determine when the exam will start, noting that you will have four weeks to complete it once it begins (committee members are responsible for sending their questions to the graduate coordinator the week before the exam starts)
c) you are responsible for sending the completed exams to the committee members upon the completion of the four week period
d) the exam defense date must be 1-2 weeks after the completion of the exam
The qualifying exam committee will select a set of four questions with the goal of permitting the student to demonstrate evidence of their ability to review the literature in an area, to demonstrate a sufficient breadth of knowledge in the field, or to show technical competence in particular methods or techniques.
Responses should be word processed, double-spaced, and follow APA formatting. Generally, responses run 10-15 pages for each question. There are three members on this committee, one of whom acts as Chair. These individuals may be selected by the student but must be members of the STEM Education GSC. The Graduate Adviser must make the final approval.
The qualifying exam is a take home exam. Students have four weeks to complete the exam and must not consult with anyone about the exam during this time except qualifying exam committee members. Students are not allowed to discuss or share their specific questions or responses with other students, at any time during or after the exam. This rule includes outside assistance with editing and proofreading.
At the two-hour oral examination, committee members may ask questions on the students' written responses or on any other aspect of mathematics and science education within the students' expected program of work. This may include questions specific to content.
Following the conclusion of the oral examination, the committee will meet and decide on one of the following options: pass, pass with conditions, fail. There is a form that they sign. Any and all conditions placed on a student must be met prior to advancement to candidacy.
Process:
1. The student must have completed all required coursework in the semester previous to the one in which they begin the exam.
2. Under advisement of their faculty mentor/chair, the student decides on one of 3 formats for their QE: a) Small-scale empirical study (using data the student collects or data to which they have access from a prior project, faculty mentor, national data, etc.); b) Critical literature review related to students’ dissertation interest, or C) Conceptual/theoretical paper
3. The student (with approval from the chair and the other 2 committee members) decides on the semester to start the exam and the committee and student must agree on this no later than the end of the second week of the semester (Note: the committee is comprised of a total of 3 STEM Ed GSC members, but at least one STEM Ed program area faculty must be on the committee).
Timeline:
1. The student has 2 consecutive semesters to complete the exam (either Fall/Spring, Spring/Summer, or Summer/Fall)
A. Although it is possible for the student to complete in one semester, 2 is the maximum (i.e., if student started in Fall, they must have passed the QE by the last day of the semester in the subsequent Spring semester). Therefore steps 2-4 below must all occur within 2 semesters.
2. The due date for the submission of the first full draft (submission 1) is determined by the committee in consultation with the student. After submission, the committee will read the draft, provide comments for revision to the chair, who then synthesizes comments (with approval and sign-off of all members) and shares this in written form with the student within 2 weeks of initial submission.
A. It is possible but unlikely that the committee may decide that no revisions are needed and to accept submission 1; if so, the QE exam is done and the student has passed.
3. Assuming a revision is required, the deadline for revision 1/submission 2 is determined by the committee in consultation with the student;
A. After receiving revision 1/submission 2 (which should include a letter to the committee detailing the revisions that were made in response to the comments provided), the committee has 2 weeks to read the document; they will then confer as a group and vote to: accept, or request another round of revisions
B. To pass the exam, at least 2 members must vote to accept, one of which must be the Chair
4. If the committee votes to request another round of revisions, the deadline for revision 2/submission 3 is determined by the committee in consultation with the student (noting that the deadline (including the 2-week committee review period) must meet the requirement of occurring before the end of the second semester of the total allowed exam period)
A. After receiving revision 2/submission 3, the committee has 2 weeks to read the document; they will confer as a group and vote to: accept, or reject
B. To pass the exam, at least 2 members must vote to accept, one of which must be the Chair
C. If the committee votes to reject, the student's program will be terminated..
Other Logistics
The student may have done preliminary work on their empirical study/literature review/theoretical or conceptual paper prior to the semester they begin their exam as part of prior coursework or work supervised by their mentor/chair; however, it is understood that the majority of the writing of the paper should occur during the semester(s) of the exam.
The final document (not including the letter of response) should be in APA format and between 20-40 pages in length (excluding references and tables).
It is recommended that the student identify one or more journals that would be a good ‘fit’ for their study/lit review/conceptual paper and that would provide models of articles in terms of formatting and other conventions of the journalsNote: Students must work with the Graduate Coordinator and Graduate Adviser to submit their program of work to the GSC for approval upon successful completion of course requirements and their qualifying exam. The GSC will meet to address questions in cases where a student’s candidacy is not approved unanimously. Approval must be made by a majority vote, and conditions may be attached.