Basic Format

Catalog numbers at NPL are unique. Specify will not let you save 2 Collection Object records with the same catalog number. The format is pretty simple, and the catalog number field on the data entry form won't let you save an incorrectly formatted  number.

Simply put, the catalog format is 3 alphanumeric digits, 8 numeric digits, then 3 alphanumeric digits again.

Assigning New Numbers

In the main room of PRC 122, you'll find a list of printed NPL numbers. Most of the time, all you'll need to do is cut off a number from that list and put it in the tray with the specimen.

If you are working with an incoming collection, it is best to head to the Number Allocation Database and update the information there. In this access database, all fields must be filled out. Putting a question mark, or a zero, is common for indicating such info was unknown at the time of the number entry.

Historic Catalog Numbers

Over the decades, NPL has acquired a variety of collections. Many of these have their own catalogs, and for the most part, we have been able to keep those original numbers. This is why you see so many collection acronyms. WSA, P, UT, TX, BEG, OMB are just a few examples.

Rarely, historic numbers must be reassigned to make them work with the Specify number format. This seems to happen mostly with TX numbers, which used a format of 4 numbers, TX, then a suffix. Sometimes the suffix would exceed 3 digits, especially in cases where a letter was added to show different specimens on the same slab. Cases like this are the ONLY example where we are reassigning catalog numbers. In the past, many Plummer type specimens were reassigned BEG numbers and this is still causing issues 60 years later.

Problem Solving Number Conflicts

Always check with the curator before changing any number! It's fine to present the boss with a solution instead of a problem, but don't implement the solution without approval!

I'm adding a specimen to the database and I get an error message saying Specify can't save the record due to a duplicate record. What do I do?

It depends on a variety of factors.

• First, verify that you typed the number correctly. If that checks out, search the database for the catalog number, and make a note of its storage location. You'll have to physically verify the number of that specimen.
  • Have the numbers been switched, or read incorrectly? NPL 88866 can easily be typed as NPL 88886. Show the curator what happened, and ask to change the database record to correct the number.
• Has someone given a P specimen a BEG collection acronym? It's really easy to do. Show the curator the specimens and ask for clarification, then ask to change the database record.
• If you've checked and both specimens are truly the same number, just in different trays in different locations, you've run across a catalog number that is also a bulk lot number. If there is no taxa determination associated with either tray, go ahead and make your entry an additional preparation of the existing record. Remember to set the status to 'Verified'! This way, we know it's a real preparation and just a mistake in the procedure of moving a specimen.
  • If one lot has a taxon determination that does not apply to the other tray, assign a suffix to the tray you are adding to the database. In inventory remarks, state what you did and why, and change the status to Verified.
• It's a genuine duplication of numbers. This does happen- in the past the spreadsheet that generates NPL numbers glitched and repeated rows of numbers. It's been fixed, but we have no way of knowing how long the bug was present. Normally giving one specimen a new NPL number is fine, but check with the curator.

I have a tray of 52 specimens, all different fossils, and all assigned the name NPL number. A researcher wants to borrow a single specimen.

Be sure to record that only 1 specimen is borrowed in the loan form. But this is not a number conflict. Yet. See the next question

Now, the specimen from the above is going to be the subject of a publication. How do we designate the published specimen from its 51 others?

The published specimen retains the main number, and the remaining 51 are assigned a suffix. Make a note of this in the specimen remarks field on both entries in the database.Make a note, also, on any labels in the tray. If this is a specimen that has a paper catalog associated with it, make a note in the catalog, also.

I have found a published holotype that has a duplicate number somewhere in another part of the collection. What do I do?

First, never change the catalog number of a published specimen. That is solely for the curator to decide on, and only regular staff members should follow through with it.

This is another case where looking at the other specimen will usually provide the answer.

• • If the other specimen is a cast of the holotype, follow the specimen moved protocol and bring the cast to the type room and add the cast preparation to the holotype record.
  • If the other specimen is a tray of unsorted material, assign a suffix to the tray you are adding to the database. In inventory remarks, state what you did and why, and change the status to Verified. Make a note on the label, as well as in the physical catalog if one exists for the collection you are working with.

I was looking at some records in Specify and noticed NPL00012345.00A, and NPL00012345.A00 are in the storage location. I checked, and there is only 'NPL 12345 A' in the drawer. What do I do?

Check with the curator and ask to delete the less complete record. We have a good number of these conflicts in the database, and by dealing with them when we come across them, we'll be able to whittle them all out eventually! But again, DO NOT delete a record if you have not been given the green light, or if you are uncomfortable doing so! You can always ask a staff member to delete it for you.